environmental & social impacts lessons learned
Q & A references links
Power Point Presentation
|
|
|
environmental & social impacts lessons learned Q & A references links Power Point Presentation |
Lessons Learned
Alternative project considerations can offer a backdrop of
information regarding different forms of meeting the project under questions
specifications, however most of these are not taken seriously in light of the
main goal of promoting the project under question.
Following the guidelines religiously with no deviation or
outside thought should not be encouraged. This can leave room for information
that has not been taken into consideration by the joint review panel to be
ignored.
The Alternative Means of carrying out the project are the
most important subjects to understand well – when reviewing an EIS
– as they normally act as the backbone to which each assessment is based
upon.
References
Bruce Power. 2008a. Bruce
New Nuclear Power Plant Project Environmental Statement Volume 1. Prepared by Golder
Associates Ltd. September 2008.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
(CEAA) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC). 2008. Guidelines
for the Preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement for Bruce PowerÕs New
Nuclear Power Plant Project. Prepared in consultation with
Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Transport Canada. August 2008. Retrieved on
February 6 2009, from http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/050/documents/28529/28529E.pdf
Lee,
N. & Colley, R. 1992. Reviewing the Quality of Environmental Statements. Occasional paper #24. EIA
Center, University of Manchester.
UNEP: Environmental Impact
Assessment Training Resource Manual, 2nd Edition. Topic 9: Review of EIA Quality.
http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/EIA_2ed/EIA_E_
top9_tit.PDF